On Wednesday 27 October 2004 12:18 pm, Colin Jensen wrote: > Subversion plans on enhancements for stuff like distributed development > with private repositories (and pretty much all the other complaints listed > in dwheeler's essay). But it does not have it now. Since distributed > development seems to be one of the Big Deals Bob is looking for, we need to > use something other than Subversion. My primary concern is security, pgp-signed repositories (archives) and pgp-signed changesets (commits). The distributed nature of arch isn't really an issue, since I think we will still do a central development model regardless of the revision control tool used. -- Bob Tanner <tanner at mn-linux.org> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288 _______________________________________________ vanilla-devel mailing list vanilla-devel at us.netrek.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/vanilla-devel