On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Rado S wrote: > =- James Cameron wrote on Sun 24.Feb'08 at 22:15:21 +1100 -= > > > > > From Paradise 2000 README: > > > > > > Please, can we focus on replacing that with a more useful > > > standard P-client rather than using this as a reference for > > > anything? Avoid any reference to it in the future, thank you. > > > > While the key is present and people use it, I think we need to > > continue to refer to it as necessary. > > But the presence is questioned, not just by me, but some netrek > authority, too. Maybe the whole issue could be solved faster if the > presence issue were solved first. I agree. > > Nothing has changed in the situation, except a few people have > > made patches and some others have noticed them. > > Sometimes this is enough to cross the critical threshold. It was for you, yes. > > If you can out-do the current key maintainer and convince all > > server operators to follow your key list, go ahead. I don't see > > that as likely. Carlos at least has our trust. > > I never asked for takeover and following _my_ leadership. > I just asked for _some_ _more_ active leadership. > But nobody felt like doing it nor following anyone else even if he/ > they stood up to serve. > So netrek as a whole has the mess it deserves. It is fascinating how you presume there should be community and leadership. Good luck. -- James Cameron mailto:quozl at us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/