=- Mark Mielke wrote on Fri 21.Mar'08 at 12:37:18 -0400 -= > Rado S wrote: > > I asked independently of my person and not for myself alone or in > > particular. > > It's pointless to discuss any specifics as long as there is a strict > > "no way" lingering around. Once this is cleared up, we may > > continue with the details of who and what. > > > > Rado: It's also pointless to speak in generalities. If you have > something that is reasonable, and you put up, I'm sure all will > agree with you and let you have your way. As a matter of fact, I was speaking very specifically with James. I wonder why anyone else was speaking up talking about generalities before he replied, given that he is the only one doing anything. Don't jump the gun, guys. > As is it, I see only you debating trivial points with the current > owner of our respect, to no end that I would agree with, so from > my perspective, you aren't earning any respect, and as a vote, I > implicitly vote that whatever James says goes. Fine, so let him speak for himself. I never assumed James couldn't speak for himself. > You are not going to get allies with the path you have been > taking. Nor did I assume that either of the 2 of us needed allies. Is somebody under attack? If so, who is attacking who by what? -- © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.