On 2009-05-19 09:49:36 -0500, Jeremy Shupe <jeremy.shupe at gmail.com> said: > All told, however, I can not understand how the program might have swelled > to 300 megs of memory usage. I am trying to do a methodical analysis today, > tracking memory usage over time. So I'll look at those results tonight. Lots of details missing from my irc discussion. :-) I never said the program (poller) leaked memory or there was anything wrong with the poller. I just stated that the JVM when running the poller takes 300M. I further stated that I think the Swing to Cocoa bridge is what is the memory pig (not the poller). I have not done any testing. As far as I know 300M is the base memory footprint for the JVM under osx. -- Bob Tanner <basic at us.netrek.org> Key fingerprint = F785 DDFC CF94 7CE8 AA87 3A9D 3895 26F1 0DDB E378