The problem with WebRTC is that is not fully supported on all, notably on Apple devices through Safari.
> On May 16, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Andrew Sillers <apsillers at gmail.com> wrote:
> WebRTC support would be a great addition. WebRTC could be used alongside a Websocket connection, just like UDP is used alongside TCP in the current clients (since those are the underlying WebRTC and WS transport protocols).
> 
> For a mobile Phonegap app, we can just use native TCP and UDP plugins without needing to use the Web-specific wrappers.
> 
>> On May 16, 2015 6:52 AM, "Sven Neuhaus" <sven-netrek-dev at sven.de> wrote:
>> Am 14.05.15 um 17:40 schrieb Andrew Sillers:
>> > I completely agree. There was some (very brief) discussion about
>> > Websocket server support when I was originally working on the client.
>> 
>> Instead of using Websocket, nowadays using a WebRTC data connection in
>> the browser is probably preferable. WebRTC uses UDP and should provide
>> better latency.
>> 
>> -Sven
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netrek-dev mailing list
>> netrek-dev at us.netrek.org
>> http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev
> _______________________________________________
> netrek-dev mailing list
> netrek-dev at us.netrek.org
> http://mailman.us.netrek.org/mailman/listinfo/netrek-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.us.netrek.org/pipermail/netrek-dev/attachments/20150517/867ad553/attachment.html>