On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Dave Sherohman wrote: > Performance-wise, how does aterm compare to Eterm for doing the transparent/ > shade bit? That's basically how I run my Eterms (transparent, 50% shading), > but when the root window changes, it takes a couple seconds for all the > Eterms to update. (0.9.x is a vast improvement over 0.8.x WRT updating, > though...) I switched from Eterm to aterm because it's a helluva lot quicker, and a helluva lot leaner (about the same footprint as a xterm with no special fun stuff) -- Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (952)943-8500 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe at mn-linux.org For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help at mn-linux.org