Everyone has their own opinion of what distro is better. I think for Linux to suceed, Redhat or not, Linux users (Debian included!) shouldn't flame on Redhat or other companies just because they don't like them. I havn't made a post yet that suggests I hate Debian or some other distribution. What I see happening in the near future is the fact that you have all these distros, but there isnt one GREAT distro of all. You have tons of satisfied people with Redhat, Debian, Mandrake, Slackware, and more. the problem is, is that Linux isnt going to take off because you have other Linux users complaining about the fact that one distro has problems and that they should use a better one (The one the complainer is using). So... what you have in the long run is the fact that no one can make up their damned minds which one will be the one to take off. So, what do you guys think is the solution? --Nick Betcher P.S.) Dont say I flame because this isnt a flame, nor have I flamed in the past. I just try to make people face the inevitable. Have fun with this! andy at theasis.com wrote: > > All personal advocacy aside, we need to remember that TCLUG is the > > Twin Cities Linux Users' Group. As such, we have members from all > > corners of the distribution world. Unless you roll-you-own, you're > > probably using one distribution or another. Given that observation, > > we should commit ourselves to quelling the typical distribution-specif > > advocacy we would normally see on comp.os.linux.<dist>.advocacy. By > > typical, I do not mean advocacy in the manner laid out by official > > distribution policy or constitution, but advocacy that you see from > > the everyday, average distribution enthusiast. > > Advocacy is informative, if that's actually what you're doing -- i.e., > pointing out some of the strengths of a particular distribution. This even > entails a comparative approach. That's fine as long as it sticks to > *technical* points of distinction. Such discussions are educational to new > users, as well as useful to more seasoned users when switching > distributions could be potentially very costly (in terms of time, which > _is_ money after all). > > But the benefit of such discussions is completely nullified if it turns > from advocacy to eulogizing or vituperation, which then turns into rancor. > This is merely my opinion, of course. > > In short, flamewars are often enough sparked by flamebait and most of us > are capable of recognizing when we're producing that, or not reacting to > it in the most positive fashion. > > > Committing the TCLUG environment to this tenant wouldn't be too > > difficult, and it may promote a more constructive forum on the list... > > I'm all for that. > > > I'm not trying to change any personal philosophies here; just trying > > to pour a little oil on our apparently troubled waters. > > IMO, once again, it all comes down to whether each person is inclined > towards a default policy of treating respectfully the other members of the > community. > > Andy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe at mn-linux.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help at mn-linux.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe at mn-linux.org For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help at mn-linux.org