So Progeny is probably not a very good Server based distribution? Tom Veldhouse veldy at veldy.net -----Original Message----- From: tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of David Royer Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 5:29 PM To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org Subject: Re: Progeny Debian (was Re: [TCLUG] Bastille Linux) I tried Progeny on a box receintly here. The install is more graphical, and a little less confusing than the standard debian install, but I found it easier to start with the regular debian install. I had no need for X and Progeny does not give you the option of leaving out X. Dave On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Joel T Schneider wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 Scott Dier wrote: > > Well, perhaps 7.x is getting better. I dont use it. I'm moving us from > > rh6.2 all over to progeny. :) > > Is Progeny Debian 1.0 really pretty decent? > > I've heard good things about Progeny 1.0, saying it is a slim, trim, > easier to install flavor of Debian. > > I also noticed that Micro Center is listed as one of the Progeny Debian > Resellers. Might have to head over to St. Louis Park and pick up a > copy... > > Joel > > --- > Member of the GNU/X/Apache/Perl/Samba/OpenSSH/Linux generation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > ----- "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway." -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum - Computer Networks _______________________________________________ tclug-list mailing list tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list