David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > Dunno; hasn't happened to me yet. I've been running emacs since I > started 20 years ago (running the original ITS emacs, written in TECO, > on a TOPS-20 system under the "incompatibility package" which allows > ITS programs to run on TOPS-20). I've used that, JOVE, Gosling, GNU, > Epsilon, Emacs command mode in Borland's Sprint and Microsoft's Visual > Studio, and at least one other version (for TOPS-10) that I can't > remember. > > I've been able to find emacs-like editors on more classes of boxes > than vi was available for, anyway. Interesting point. Was just trying to make a statement that not all boxes have emacs on them, but from what I've been able to discern vi is always on a box. Not a slam mind you, just a point trying to bring up. I couldn't navigate my way through emacs if I wanted to at this time as I prefer and spcificly use vi. Shawn