Having just read the article, I find myself wondering... He got paid to write an article that short and lacking in content? Editorial or no, I would generally expect a bit more information than the 8 paragraphs he wrote. If he's going to offer a contrary opinion, he could at least back it up with something. He comes off as being contrary just for the sake of being contrary. -- Michael Vieths Foeclan at Winternet.Com On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Jack Ungerleider wrote: > Warning: The following was set of by an article in Network World Fusion that > can be found at: > > http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2001/0604kearns.html > > Jack