* Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> [010613 11:45]: > Could implement QoS at the border and set priorities there.. but that's > probably what you're talking about. Doing it at the local machines would Cisco 4500M router. Its a nice sucker for a t1. :) I have problems getting it to ever go over 10-15% cpu usage. > So why'd you go frame instead of ptp? Pricing these days isn't all that > much different.. PTP over LATTAS(sp?) is really expensive. :) Frame is the only way to really keep the cost down. -- Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> <sdier at debian.org> http://www.ringworld.org/ #linuxos at irc.openprojects.net Sinclair: "No boom?" Garibaldi: "No boom." Ivanova: "No boom today. Boom tomorrow. Always a boom tomorrow." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010613/47bf8700/attachment.pgp