> Not necessarily. For doing logical volumes, it's nice to have a handle on > the physical location. That's the way VMS (sorry to mention it 3 times in > one day) handles things, but you can create a logical name and say that > your directory, [foo.dir] is found on c:, d:, g:, and h:. Called bound > volumes, and I think it's the wheel that the LVM project(s) are > reinventing. I thought that's what disklabels are for? I don't know squat about disklabels, tho; so I could be wrong. Carl Soderstrom -- Network Engineer Real-Time Enterprises (952) 943-8700