On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:50:18PM -0500, Ryan Ware wrote: > http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/4134/1/ > > After you read the story... > The solution met the required result but none of the optional results. > The solution did not meet the required result, but met the optional > results. > The solution did not meet either the required result or the optional > results. > The solution was one man's desire to implement linux no matter what. > > IPC 2002 Not sure specifically what you mean by "required" and "optional" results (terminology not found in article). You're suggesting that hiring an outside party to install a M$ solution would have somehow eliminated the law firm's problems with 3rd party software? Prove it. IMHO, upgrading a business from no network to a linux server offers a much easier opportunity for "success" than migrating from an established M$ server (chock full of proprietary weirdness) to linux. -- Joel Schneider Yan Xin Qigong in Minneapolis joel at joelschneider.net http://yanxinqigong.minneapolis.mn.us/