On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:34AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote: >Absolutely. It was a reference to a common phenonmenon on the >debian-user list: Every few weeks, some yutz shows up and starts >making all the complaints mentioned above as soon as they see the age >of the stable distro and everyone else gets to explain to him that >it's called _stable_ for a reason. Hopefully, Debian won't have to >put up with that sort of thing any more. More likely, Red Hat will >be sharing in the pain. I for one appreciate the stability of "stable" but at some point people have to wonder why in gods name they can't get a timely release. I'd love to be able to use debian stable on production boxes, but it's so god awful old I really can't. -- Ben Lutgens http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ Sistina Software Inc. (mail -s "get -info" blutgens-info at sistina.com) for my gpg key, IM info etc. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020321/f5b45ea3/attachment.pgp