On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 03:27:38 -0500 (CDT) "Michael Jentges" <mike at JentgeS.NeT> wrote: > > Any bets the whole fiasco started because a user sent either a > question or a thanks to one of those addresses? > > > :) > > -mj I'm sure that had a lot to do with it. I used SmoothWall since like 0.9.4 or so, when I got it as a freebie disc with some Linux rag. I joined the mailing list and watched it grow. By the time 0.9.9 was out, I'd had enough. I was one of the first beta testers for IPCOP, joined their mailing list, and never really looked back. Yes, essentially they're the same thing. But, not for long as IPCOP transitions to LFS. IMHO, support is far better with IPCOP, questions get answered relatively politely and efficiently, very little anger, far better attitude, a wiki on their homepage, a friendlier IRC channel than SW, etc.. Some of the developers on that SM credits list are now the core developers for IPCOP, chiefly, Mark Wormgoor. But, enough of the flogging. It's dead, Jim. -- -Kevin Hinze rudie at rudie.net | rudie at sihope.com hinz0047 at tc.umn.edu | http://rudie.net Democracy: two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for lunch Liberty: a well armed sheep expressing his rights. _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list