FYI - DCC has consistently accounted for more than 50% of the spam stopped for our (commercial) anti-spam product over the last couple of weeks (since we brought it to the latest version). For the last 10 minutes: DCC 51% SpamAss 28% Blacklist 9% (user-defined keyword-based blacklist) DNSBL 8% (User's choice of 70+ DNS-based blacklists) Razor 1% (Razor version 1 - needs upgraded :( ) Other 1% (Anti-virus, etc) Real-time stats updated every 10 minutes are at http://marvin.sihope.com Over the last 60 days, total spam stopped: SpamAssassin 438,969 DNSBL 293,472 DCC 230,471 Blacklist 87,873 Virus 10,048 Razor 8,602 I wouldn't count on these numbers as an actual benchmark of effectiveness. Not all users have the same settings, so it's possible that some people have only 1 of these tools turned on, or their SA scores are different, or their DCC threshholds are different, etc. On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 22:42, Jay Kline wrote: > What spam filtering do people use? I have been using SpamAssassin, but > it seems the spam is mutating faster than SpamAssassin can be updated > (at least on my inbox). I have also tried Lokisa (statistical spam > filtering) but it dosnt seem to train well for me. I am looking for > something that can be run via procmail in some way, and the statistical > filters seem to be the way to go. > > Jay > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list