On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Tom Poe wrote: > Steve Cayford wrote: > >> I have no objections to a name change. Probably calls for a poll of >> some sort though. > > If there's money involved, maybe it would be good to know how much, and > then have suggestions on how best to spend that money to maximum benefit > for everyone. Maybe it might be better to look before committing to a > name change. I think we can start by discussing whether a name change is a good idea in principle. I think it is. Then we can talk about what the real effects of a name change are: Updating web page text, web page graphics, letterhead(?), schwag, and so on. I think tclug.org is fine to keep. If we vote to change the name, we should just change in web page text both the long name (to Twin Cities GNU/Linux User Group) and the abbreviation (to TCGLUG), which should be an easy perl regexp kind of thing to do, and then deal with the graphical stuff in time. Mike