On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Jordan Peacock wrote: > Honestly, I stopped bothering with reading the spam^h^h^h^h discussion > about TC *G* LUG, and it since it looks like so far 100% of the votes > are against a name change, hopefully they will guide the direction of > further discussion. That was 100% of the "votes" by the inconsiderate members, like yourself, who were not told to vote yet but are cluttering the list with wasteful nonsense. So far there has been no vote. I have noticed a strong tendency toward inaccuracy, hyperbole, boorishness and outright craziness coming from the anti-change constituency. What's wrong with you people? Why can't you just wait, then vote "no"? Please don't answer -- those were rhetorical questions. Mike