Sorry, the ball started rolling. Debating on how we should manage the vote at this level strikes me as the worst kind of organization. Let's get on with it and get it over with. If whatever, whoever, whichever officers exist here want us to do it over, let them say so. Otherwise, it appears to me that some clearer picture of what the group wants is coming to the fore. "like yourself, who were not told to vote yet but are cluttering the list with wasteful nonsense." yeah, no kidding... wasteful nonsense. i'm not in the habit of waiting to be told to vote, not this season. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Mike Miller <mbmiller at taxa.epi.umn.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Jordan Peacock wrote: > >> Honestly, I stopped bothering with reading the spam^h^h^h^h discussion >> about TC *G* LUG, and it since it looks like so far 100% of the votes >> are against a name change, hopefully they will guide the direction of >> further discussion. > > That was 100% of the "votes" by the inconsiderate members, like yourself, > who were not told to vote yet but are cluttering the list with wasteful > nonsense. So far there has been no vote. > > I have noticed a strong tendency toward inaccuracy, hyperbole, boorishness > and outright craziness coming from the anti-change constituency. What's > wrong with you people? Why can't you just wait, then vote "no"? Please > don't answer -- those were rhetorical questions. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >