> -----Original Message----- > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of Mike Miller > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:25 PM > To: TCLUG List > Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Name Change Vote > > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Jordan Peacock wrote: > > > Honestly, I stopped bothering with reading the spam^h^h^h^h discussion > > about TC *G* LUG, and it since it looks like so far 100% of the votes > > are against a name change, hopefully they will guide the direction of > > further discussion. > > That was 100% of the "votes" by the inconsiderate members, like yourself, > who were not told to vote yet but are cluttering the list with wasteful > nonsense. So far there has been no vote. > > I have noticed a strong tendency toward inaccuracy, hyperbole, boorishness > and outright craziness coming from the anti-change constituency. What's > wrong with you people? Why can't you just wait, then vote "no"? Please > don't answer -- those were rhetorical questions. TCLUG has no "decider": nobody has the authority to say when a vote is valid or invalid. You don't. Your claim of a voting window is just more of the cacophony by non-deciders. :-) If we must have such poppycock as arbitrary voting windows, we must assume it's a ploy to stack the vote. That suggests that we submit votes daily or hourly until this goes away :-) Chuck