> -----Original Message-----
> From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:25 PM
> To: TCLUG List
> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Name Change Vote
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Jordan Peacock wrote:
>
> > Honestly, I stopped bothering with reading the spam^h^h^h^h discussion
> > about TC *G* LUG, and it since it looks like so far 100% of the votes
> > are against a name change, hopefully they will guide the direction of
> > further discussion.
>
> That was 100% of the "votes" by the inconsiderate members, like yourself,
> who were not told to vote yet but are cluttering the list with wasteful
> nonsense.  So far there has been no vote.
>
> I have noticed a strong tendency toward inaccuracy, hyperbole, boorishness
> and outright craziness coming from the anti-change constituency.  What's
> wrong with you people?  Why can't you just wait, then vote "no"?  Please
> don't answer -- those were rhetorical questions.

TCLUG has no "decider": nobody has the authority to say when a vote is valid or invalid.  You don't.  Your claim of a voting window
is just more of the cacophony by non-deciders.  :-)    If we must have such poppycock as arbitrary voting windows, we must assume
it's a ploy to stack the vote.

That suggests that we submit votes daily or hourly until this goes away  :-)



Chuck