On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Dan Rue wrote: > I felt that we were entering into (or continuing) a classic bikeshed[1] > argument That makes no sense. We were in the process of deciding how a vote could be undertaken. I wrote that I would send out a message detailing what the proposed changes would be that we would then vote on. You preempted that and other work. It was not helpful. This "vote" has been a complete mess, partly, you say, because of you. > By my count, the "No Change" crowd is winning by a substantial margin to > the rest of the groups combined, so most of this discussion is moot > unless enough people change their vote, or enough additional votes come > in to create some sort of argument for change. What will they win? We obviously need to start another group to replace this one. This is not really a group at all. It's just an email distribution list. A group has some kind of organizational structure. > I'm not sure why "just voting" is being met so hostily, except perhaps > that the results are less than favorable to some people? The "vote" was a disruption of a productive process. Mike