Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 14:32:28 -0800
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19971127103718.00696444@mail.davlin.net>
References: <3.0.5.32.19971127071136.008a5100@darla><199711270937.JAA19599@goole.octacon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 10:37 AM 11/27/97 -0600, David Routh wrote:
>At 07:11 AM 11/27/97 -0800, Matt Holdrege wrote:
>>At 09:35 AM 11/27/97 -0000, Paul Huish wrote:
>>>V1.140N-K56_DLP_CSM of the Rockwell modem 
>>>
>>>Is this a new version of the Rockwell code or the same as in p33?
>>
>
>Here's a clip from a Shiva LRAS... does this mean the code in the LRAS is a
>later version?

Yes. 

>	V1.155DMC-K56_DLP_CS RC56DPF L8565A Rev 42.0/42.0
>
>and if so what are the advantages... where's Rockwell on code anyway?

None that we could justify using it for. We are currently testing a later
version (1.160t) which may have further fixes for the 14400 modem connectivity
problems.


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

From: "Paul Huish" <Paul.Huish@onyx.net>

Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

From: David Routh <ascend@davlin.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) modemdiag output on 5.0Ap36
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36 - update
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread