Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

To: Michael Medwid <mmedwid@symantec.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 00:18:48 -0500 (EST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <88256561.0005EDD0.00@notes.symantec.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com


 I'm going to load it tonight on about 100 boxes, So, If there are
any problem, I'll post em as they occur.

Jason


On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Michael Medwid wrote:

> 
> Having been bitten by being an early adopter of 5.0Ap34 (hey - it was
> there!)..I'm a bit
> reluctant to embrace Ap36.  Anyone have some solid up time with this
> revision?
> I'm especially interested if you're routing IP and IPX.  Thanks.  -Michael
> 
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

From: John Coy <jcoy@anc.net>

References:

(ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

From: "Michael Medwid"<mmedwid@symantec.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Multi Linking/ Load Balancing
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread