Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

[Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>]

It's an issue that Rockwell have been "fighting" with them over, so I
don't have all the details. I'll check into it via my Engineers though.

At 09:20 AM 12/4/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
> Is there a trouble ticket reference # or anything that I can 
>refer to when I call up USR to ask about this bug?
>
>Jason Nealis
>
>
>On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Paul Monaghan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> 
>> > Yeah, both Lucent and Rockwell put in a patch to workaround this USR bug.
>> > 
>> > Good to see it is doing the trick!
>> 
>> Is there a reason that USR isn't fixing this?  Why should Rockwell/Lucent
>> have to come up with a fix for a USR problem?  I must admitt that I'm glad
>> it's there, but I still think it should have been done on USR's side of
>> things.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> --
>> Paul Monaghan (PM1819, paulm@ican.net)
>> Technical Team Leader - Internet - ACC Telenterprises Ltd.
>> bobCode: KItpd lWm EMC++ m7 CPE B0 Ol Lb SC Tx A5 H9o b2
>> 
>> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>> 
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>

Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• From: Paul Monaghan <paulm@ican.net>
• Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Land Attack on max's
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread