Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

 Actuall, With your setup a Single TNT would take care of ya. To obtain
the 672 you need to link toghether 3 full TNT's. But if all you have is
12 PRI's then you can terminate all those in one box, (And that way
you don't even need to stack to be able to offer 2 B's.)

Jason Nealis
Erols Internet


On Thu, 18 Dec 1997, Stephen Balbach wrote:

> 
> Believe, Or Not
> 
> Should I be looking into it? Currently have 12 PRI's on 4000's and
> stacking multi-B's aint always working.
> 
> 	Stb
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• From: Stephen Balbach <stephen@clark.net>
• Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• From: Stephen Dolloff <vardalak@mc.net>

References:

• (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• From: Stephen Balbach <stephen@clark.net>

---

• Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) tik.m40 working at all?
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P50 4.6b vs Max4000 4.5Bp1
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Idle time for a session
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread