Re: (ASCEND) Re: MAX modems AT command init string question

[Joe Pautler <pautler@grasshopper.cit.buffalo.edu>]

Peter Lalor wrote:
]
]>We are using a MAX4048 to provide dialin access to our university.  We
]>support k56 callers and ISDN callers.  If possible, we would like to
]>set up the Ascend modems so that they will *only* do k56...in other
]>words if someone calls in with a v.34 modem, we don't want them to
]>be able to connect.  We've been playing around with changing the init
]>strings on the MAX (via the diag command "mdbStr").  Anyone have
]>any suggestions?
]>
]>(In case you're interested, we want to do this because we already
]>have a saturated 500+ line v.34 string, and we don't want the overflow
]>users to monopolize the MAX, and prevent access for k56 and ISDN
]>people)
]
]Looking at this another way, perhaps you could take the 56k/ISDN lines and
]make them a separate hunt group? 100% effective. ;-)

It is a seperate hunt group, but there is no way to prevent v.34
users from dialing into it, and monopolizing the lines.... unless
I'm misunderstanding your suggestion.

___________________________________________________________________________
Joe Pautler					University at Buffalo
CIT/OSS Network Engineering			224 Computing Center
http://www.oss.buffalo.edu/~pautler		(716) 645-3536
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) Re: MAX modems AT command init string question
• From: Peter Lalor <plalor@infoasis.com>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Multiple logins...
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) radius quirk: multiple CLID numbers
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Re: MAX modems AT command init string question
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Fair Price for a 4004 w/6 56K DM12s -- again!
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread