Re: (ASCEND) Bonded T1's?

To: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Bonded T1's?
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:53:30 -0600 (CST)
cc: Tim Connolly <tec@mountain.net>, SKozicki@BlueStar.net, ascend-users@max.bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19971231083945.00927830@darla>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

It depends on whats on both sides of the link.  If you've got constant
routing changes (remote pops), and you run OSPF, every time a link goes
up/down you get routing changes.  LSAs, Hellos, and Electing DRs etc. can
cause a link to fill up quickly in an environment with constantly changing
route tables.  It all depends on what you're doing however, as there are
no blanket solutions for anything these days.

Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
Fortune for today: "You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without
holding on." -- Dean Martin

On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, Matt Holdrege wrote:

> I thought OSPF was the antithesis of chatty. Especially compared with RIP.
> OSPF only sends updates when there are changes. And this is a simple
> point-to-point, router-to-router link. 
> 
> Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

(ASCEND) a free 95/NT (SNMP) .exe?

From: nolan@cp-tel.net (Nolan W. Bailey, Jr.)

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Bonded T1's?

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Comprehensive INIT reference
Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) MRTG and max4000
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Bonded T1's?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) a free 95/NT (SNMP) .exe?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread