> > Having been bitten by being an early adopter of 5.0Ap34 (hey - it was > there!)..I'm a bit > reluctant to embrace Ap36. Anyone have some solid up time with this > revision? > I'm especially interested if you're routing IP and IPX. Thanks. -Michael ] > tss r ] ts0 system revision: ebk.m40 5.0Ap36 ] > tss u ] system uptime: up 4 days, 4 hours, 48 minutes, 21 seconds Prior to 5.0Ap36 we would spontaneously combust^H^H^H^H^H^Hreboot every 2 days or so. Working fine so far. Regards, Damien Miller ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg11259.html">(ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: "Michael Medwid"<mmedwid@symantec.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11281.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36 release notes</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11280.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11328.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11351.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail3.html#11276"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd256.html#11276"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>