Thanks, Brett Hawn wrote: > > Because the new features never work until some other company has already > gotten there and done it correctly. Because this is not an uncommon > occurance. Because it is consistent with Ascend since they started to > constantly be _almost_ right but never on target. Forge ahead all you want, > I for one would settle for a 'golden' release like 5.0 was. Its basic common > sense (at least to me) to stop every once in a while and say 'screw new > features' lets go fix all the ones we still haven't made work right. To my > knowledge OSPF _STILL_ doesn't work correctly and thats not exactly a new > feature by anyone's determination. You want to know why we're always > bitching? Its because simple little things like this are exactly whats wrong > with Ascend, a complete and total lack everywhere in the company of QUALITY > CONTROL. _THAT_ sir is why we bitch. > > On Thu, Nov 27, 1997 at 12:18:02PM -0600, Stephen Dolloff made some electrons appear in the following form: > > Garbage like this is really irritating. What we have here is a company > > who is forging ahead in areas of new technology and communications. They > > have consistantly continued to develop and support new and emerging > > features. Not only do you want all of the new features yesterday, but you > > expect it to work perfectly and then on top of that, you have the gall to > > publicly criticize them for a one digit typo in documentation the day that > > it comes out. Can you possibly tell me why this is necessary? Or do you > > really have nothing better to do? > > > > On Thu, 27 Nov 1997, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > > > > > > > > The 5.0Ap36 (MAX 400x, 1800, 2000, 200+) has been given to support. This > > > release contains the following corrections: > > > > > > Interesting. The release notes talk about 5.0Ap34. Looks like another > > > fine example of Ascends quality control in action. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg11095.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NL.net></LI> </UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg11122.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Stephen Dolloff <vardalak@mc.net></LI> </UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg11125.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Brett Hawn <blh@texas.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11512.html">(ASCEND) 56KFlex Dial-in/Disc. Cause 47 ?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11509.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11125.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11128.html">Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#11510"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd256.html#11510"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>