Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) o's in PRI display
At 04:44 PM 6/17/97 -0500, Richard Yoo wrote:
>On 02:31 PM 6/17/97 -0700, Kevin Smith shaped the electrons to say...
>>Does this work 100% every time, and the o's problem is also 100%
>reproducible
>>when only power-cycling ?
>
>Haven't tried it... we're too afraid that our PRI will be down again for 3
>days! <sigh>
>
>>The network in the meantime *never* saw the PRI go down because of the
>>power-cycle loop-back, so continues to process calls as if nothing had
>>happened. So, since the CO *never* sends the "restart" to the P400, the
>>channels stay in the "o" state....our software however figures that if
>>a call is presented, we should still answer it - the network must know
>>best ;)...and those channels will go back "in service" as a result. The
>>rest still stay in the "o" state waiting for that "restart", or a "wake-up"
>>call...
>>
>>Does this appear to match what we are seeing here ?
>
>Well, I think I'm seeing the o's REAPPEAR after the calls drop... I'm
>confused...
OK. I thought I had seen a display with 4 "-"s before the "o"s - maybe they
were all active calls. The part about going in-service after a call was added
after I thought I saw that display. I guess it makes as much sense to return
the channel to the previous state after the call clears.
Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or <ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>
Follow-Ups:
References: