On the Cisco that you said was mixing rip with OSPF ... that should only
happen if you purposely have a 'redistribute' statement in your router
OSPF {pid} stanza. I have never seen IOS redistribute without that.
If you need to run both rip and OSPF, you certainly want rip2 to handle
the VLSM issue.
Best regards,
David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
dave@fast.net (610) 289-1100 <A HREF="http://www.fast.net">http://www.fast.net</A>
FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin Smith [SMTP:kevin@ascend.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 1997 5:55 PM
>To: Joe Shaw; Jason Nealis
>Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
>Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend DoS attack
>
>At 12:09 PM 6/29/97 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
>>Then I would most likely believe that it's an OSPF problem that existed
>>before 5.0Ap13.
>
>The assign-address functionality is part of the PPP code - nothing to
>do with the routing protocol in use, so I don't see why OSPF versus RIP
>would have any effect.
>
>Jason - are you running the IP-only load? (tik.m40 or tk.m40 for examples)
>
>>I'll downgrade one of our maxen to 5.0ap8 again, and turn
>>it to do rip instead of OSPF. One question, are you running rip1 or rip2?
>
>Please, let me know what happened if you did have chance to try this out...
>
>>We recently switched back to rip2 because OSPF started flaking out again
>
>...any details on this ?
>
>>(still not sure if it's the MAX or another piece of hardware). Also, I'm
>>interested to see if it's something limited to our network setup. We've
>>got a dual FDDI ring, and our maxen terminate into a fddi/ethernet switch.
>>I released the bug to bugtraq, and subsequently the ascend list to see if
>>anyone else experienced the problem. So far, I've gotten very little
>>feedback from people, but so far, no one else has been able to reproduce
>>the bug. Interesting...
>
>...very interesting. Did you manage to get traces of this happening ? Routing
>tables ? Have you tried going back with the same config to see if it's still
>happening (We'll do this in the LAB, but if you already did.....:)
>
>
>Kevin
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq">http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq</A>>
>or <<A HREF="ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt">ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt</A>>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq">http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq</A>>
or <<A HREF="ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt">ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt</A>>
</PRE>
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<HR>
<STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>:
<UL>
<LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg06006.html">RE: (ASCEND) Ascend DoS attack</A></STRONG></LI>
<UL>
<LI><EM>From</EM>: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net></LI>
</UL>
</UL>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<HR>
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg05990.html">Re: (ASCEND) p75 from usa to taipei</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg05989.html">Re: (ASCEND) K56Flex disconnects and non-connects</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg05979.html">Re: (ASCEND) Ascend DoS attack</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg06006.html">RE: (ASCEND) Ascend DoS attack</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="mail116.html#05988"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thrd59.html#05988"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</BODY>
</HTML>