Re: (ASCEND) RE: CT1's Trunk Side w/56K

To: salmond@unix.cde.com (Craig Salmond)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) RE: CT1's Trunk Side w/56K
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 12:46:20 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: nmovold@ibl.bm, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.94.970523094021.25829A-100000@unix.cde.com> from "Craig Salmond" at May 23, 97 09:46:00 am
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Craig Salmond sez:
> 
> 	Unless I'm totally confused about the data that Ascend has told
> me, and what my local telco tells me.  If you are using TRUNK side CT1's
> you CAN utilize the K56Flex Cards.  Line side is a different story.
> Atleast I home I'm right. Otherwise the 2 CT1's the telco is installing
> today are useless to me :(.

Getting promises of trunk side CT1 appears to be far easier than
getting delivery of same. One plus of PRI is the RBOC can't screw
you in this manner -- it IS trunkside...

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or		<ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>

References:

(ASCEND) RE: CT1's Trunk Side w/56K

From: Craig Salmond <salmond@unix.cde.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1
Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread