> Uhh why would you want to load an access router with BGP4? For those of us who have decided that one router holding a link state database for a large routed network gives enough touchy-feely security, ie: OSPF. (Yeah, yeah, yeah, ok, 2 routers holding the LSDB, but gotta love those Dykstra runs ...) Well, hey, another reason: Cisco does not recommend loading up a single router with more than 1 fully utilized routing protocol or more than 2-3 partially utilized routing protocols. (Can You Say "Let Rebuild The Route-Cache Every Time A Route Flaps AND Utilize 100% Of Our CPU At The Same Time") [Insert plug for GateD here, running on a GRF or not ...] rob ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq">http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq</A>> or <<A HREF="ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt">ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg00200.html">Re: (ASCEND) Ascend not 8bit transparent..</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg00205.html">Re: (ASCEND) Ascend not 8bit transparent..</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg00001.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ai10</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail5.html#00201"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="threads.html#00201"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>