XXXXXX Password = "YYYY" User-Service = Framed-User, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Ascend-Route-IP = Route-IP-Yes, Framed-Address = 129.4.140.1, Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.248, Framed-Route = "129.4.247.251/28 129.4.140.1 1", Ascend-Idle-Limit = 64000 The first entry in the "Framed-Route" is confusing me. The manual says it is the IP address of the host or subnet reached by this route. Is this the entry for the particular MAXen, the Cisco router, or the address of the incoming P75? In my example, I used it as the address of the MAX, but I don't think this is correct. If the user dialed into the other MAXen, this would not work? Thanks Kirk -----Original Message----- From: John Coy [SMTP:jcoy@arkansas.net] Sent: Saturday, May 17, 1997 3:08 PM To: Kirk Rogers Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Multiple MAX 4004's ver 5.0ap1, Stack, Rip V2, to OSPF network? At 11:20 AM 5/17/97 -0700, you wrote: >Like the subject says, has anyone attempted this configuration? > >I have (2) MAX 4004's and would like to make use of the proclaimed >"Stack" option with PRI lines terminating into both hubs, users dialing >a single number to gain access to either box, and the MAX's looking like >a single unit (MP across the chassis). > [snip] > >So...we do not want to enter static addresses into the Cisco's and would >like to implement the Stack option. Am I assuming correctly that I must >enable "Send-RipV2" in the MAX, RIPV2 in the Cisco, and the Cisco would >then be able to propagate the subnets to the rest of the network (both >host based routes from the single IP address community and 29 bit >subnets from the PXX community)? > We do something similar (that is, propagate RIP v2 back to a Cisco 7513). You can easily do this by turning on RIPv2 on your MAXen (Both-v2) and using a RADIUS entry such as this: XXXXXX Password = "UNIX" User-Service = Framed-User, Framed-Protocol = PPP, Ascend-Route-IP = Route-IP-Yes, Framed-Address = 208.133.30.26, Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.255, Framed-Route = "208.146.100.192/27 208.133.30.26 1", Ascend-Idle-Limit = 64000 In this example, user XXXXXX gets assigned the static address of 208.133.30.26 (which is on the same subnet of the MAXen - the MAXen are configured to proxy active connections). As soon as the user connects, the route 208.146.100.192/27 gets created and placed in the MAX routing table. This route entry is then propagated to each MAX as well as to the Cisco. In the Cisco, there is one static route pointing to the ethernet Interface the MAXen are connected to (this is normal). I then configured it to accept incoming routes via RipV2 as follows: router rip version 2 redistribute static network 208.133.30.0 distribute-list 5 in FastEthernet5/1 access-list 5 permit 208.146.100.0 0.0.0.255 I use the access list because the MAXen want to send back RIP entries for every modem connected (such as dial up PPP users) which is unnecessary to propagate back to the Cisco. Your Cisco is then responsible for propagating these routes back to any OSPF neighbors. The beauty of this implementation is that regardless of what MAX the customer connects his route follows him w/out any problems. Thus, stacking is only necessary if you have MPP customers who come on the last channel of one MAX and the next available channel on another one. We use stacking only for this reason. I hope that helps. If not, send me some email and I'll happily explain it more. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq">http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq</A>> or <<A HREF="ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt">ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg04947.html">RE: (ASCEND) Multiple MAX 4004's ver 5.0ap1, Stack, Rip V2, to OSPF network?</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04906.html">Re: (ASCEND) Cisco / MAX4000 callback ?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04901.html">Re: (ASCEND) TNT question?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04852.html">Re: (ASCEND) Multiple MAX 4004's ver 5.0ap1, Stack, Rip V2, to OSPF network?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04947.html">RE: (ASCEND) Multiple MAX 4004's ver 5.0ap1, Stack, Rip V2, to OSPF network?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail160.html#04902"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd15.html#04902"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>