RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75

To: Clifford Donley <cliff@donleys.com>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 19:11:42 -0700
Cc: "dereks@dallas.net" <dereks@dallas.net>, "'Earl.Barfield@oit.gatech.edu'" <Earl.Barfield@oit.gatech.edu>, "ascend-users@max.bungi.com" <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971001173425.0091e860@mail.southeast.net>
References: <01BCCE75.341F8E30.dereks@dallas.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 05:34 PM 10/1/97 -0400, Clifford Donley wrote:
>Yes, they will fail. The P75's implementation of the relevant Bellcore
>specs is incomplete and improperly done.

Exactly how is it incomplete? Can you give references? Let us know exactly
how it doesn't work in your area and we can open a trouble ticket on it. My
Caller-ID devices receive and display the number fine. 

Matt Holdrege  -  http://www.ascend.com  -  matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75

From: Clifford Donley <cliff@donleys.com>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75

From: "Derek J. Stutsman" <dereks@dallas.net>

RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75

From: Clifford Donley <cliff@donleys.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) OSPF and Area Border Router on Max
Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread