Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4

To: cliff@donleys.com (Clifford Donley)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 15:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: kevin@ascend.com, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971022173641.0092b430@mail.southeast.net> from "Clifford Donley" at Oct 22, 97 05:36:41 pm
Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Clifford Donley sez:
> 
> And it would have been even better (there appear to be many needed
> corrections/improvements in the release) if it would work with the IE 4.0
> Java library.

Err...
Did not Sun just sue Billy because Microsoft "Java" is not?

ISTM it's up to MS to make their "Java" compliant, not Ascend
to make their app non-standard....

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4

From: Clifford Donley <cliff@donleys.com>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4

From: Clifford Donley <cliff@donleys.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Cisco needs 11.2 not 11.1 to do multilink
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Max 4000 - summary of probs
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) JBPC 5.0Ai4
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread