Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(ASCEND) My Error: K56 boards rev. F



At 10:02 PM 10/28/97 -0500, Chris A. Epler wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Oct 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>> Not totally. The magic "number" is the serial number, rather than the
>> board revision.
>
>What are the recalled ranges or the range of S/N's that are good?

It turns out that I was working with poor information,
or poor recall of good information ;(

The secret actually *IS* Revision F boards. The serial number check
was supposed to make it easy to identify good versus *possible* bad
boards. Revision F is good! Serial numbers greater than 723xxxx are
good (they should all be Rev. F or better), older serial numbers
need to be checked...if they are pre-Revision F, then they should
be RMA'd. If they are Rev. F then they are the latest version - even
if the serial number is lower than 723xxxx.

Sorry for the confusion. May I be forgiven ;) ?


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>


Follow-Ups: References: