Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) P75 to USR Total Control MP+ or BACP
At 02:23 PM 10/30/97 -0600, you wrote:
> Is this true??? USR doesn't support any type of dynamic bandwidth???
Yes, and no. The two are not implicitly linked.
Yes, it's true that they do not support MP+ or BACP(yet).
BUT, they can support dynamic allocation with just MP.
>______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
>Subject: Re: (ASCEND) P75 to USR Total Control MP+ or BACP
>Author: owner-ascend-users (owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com) at
hdqt-unix-mime
>Date: 10/30/97 12:18 PM
>
>
>At 12:04 PM 10/30/97 -0500, David Kuruc wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>My P75 (5.1A, b2.p75) w/NAT enabled can successfully make 64K and 128K
>>calls to my ISP's USR Total Control unit (ISDN card hw ver 6, sw ver
>>3.5.34). I have been unsuccessful in my attempts to get dynamic bandwith
>>allocation to work with either MP+ or BACP. Does anyone know if MP+ or
>>BACP are supported/available on the USR units?
>
>MP+ no. BACP sometime when they get around to it....!
>
>
>Kevin
>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\apps\eudorapro\temp-attach\Re (ASCEND) P75 to
USR Total C"
>
Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: