This thread started with a question about an HDLC related problem that was reported against 5.0Ap16. Since it's still on the open TR list, all patch versions since then have this vulnerability. If you have been running any of 5.0Ap16, 5.0Ap20, 5.0Ap23 or 5.0Ap24 and have not seen this problem, then you are VERY UNLIKELY to see this problem in 5.0Ap27, since nothing has changed with respect to it. How bad is the problem? It is listed as HIGH priority in Engineering. A few customers have decided to remain on 5.0Ap13 because of it, they tend to be >50% ISDN calls. If you are predominantly a modem service provider, you are unlikely to see it at all. So far it has been reported by only a handful (six) of customers (most MAX users have a vast majority of modem customers rather than ISDN or a 50/50 mix). How does it manifest itself? The TR reports that after about 24 hours, the MAX stops accepting ISDN calls. There are debug messages that refer to HDLC resources being unavailable. Calls are disconnected with c=2, p=2. A system reset temporarily resolves the problem. What to do if you are seeing it? Unless you have already done so, contact Ascend tech support and tell them you are experiencing the problem with ISDN calls failing - TR#2554. If it is feasible to do so, you could down-grade the MAX to 5.0Ap13 until we announce the fix. In any extreme cases, ask to talk to the Escalations Director: >Any customers having this problem should call into support and then we will >get them the code [next week] and if it extends we will spread the Pri's out >across maxes. > >Tom *We have a fix for this in the incremental branch, but have not yet made a version that we feel to be stable enough to release. That should change within the next week-or-so, and we will have the fix in the next major release which should also appear within the next few weeks. Kevin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09292.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap27 and the HDLC problem</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Richard Johnsson <johnsson@interval.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09217.html">RE: (ASCEND) 5.0ap27????</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net></LI> </UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09223.html">RE: (ASCEND) 5.0ap27????</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09288.html">Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09284.html">(ASCEND) Ascend MAX 4000 packet filtering.</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09223.html">RE: (ASCEND) 5.0ap27????</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09292.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap27 and the HDLC problem</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#09285"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd182.html#09285"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>