> I think the consensus is that this is a bad idea for a generic > feature/enhancement. If you wish to do this on a specific installation, > and accept the responsibility for the potential security breach ;( > then you have access to the RADIUS source, and should be able to do > this with a little "hacking". > > Our security group would for sure reject this request for AAC for the > same reasons. this was for an intranet that bought four max 4048s from me. ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09674.html">Re: (ASCEND) ASCEND RADIUS FEATURE REQUEST</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09778.html">(ASCEND) Problem with Downloading in Terminal Server Mode on MAX4048</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09774.html">Re: (ASCEND) Users stay connected but cannot see any web sites</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09674.html">Re: (ASCEND) ASCEND RADIUS FEATURE REQUEST</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09626.html">Re: (ASCEND) ASCEND RADIUS FEATURE REQUEST</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail10.html#09775"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd201.html#09775"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>