Not totally. The magic "number" is the serial number, rather than the board revision. >that Rev F boards are required for reliable >connections? What got fixed on Rev F? Are the 52 non-Rev-F cards I >have going to cause me trouble down the road? Do they fall within the "good" serial numbers ? If so, don't worry. If not, call TAC and ask for an RMA. (I will be extremely surprised if anyone has the "bad" cards since they were all recalled - as far as I know). Kevin ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg10190.html">Re: (ASCEND) K56 boards rev. F</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: "Chris A. Epler" <cepler@esinet.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg10177.html">Re: (ASCEND) K56 boards rev. F</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10182.html">RE: (ASCEND) SNMP problem on Max4000.</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10178.html">Re: (ASCEND) Vendor assigned address</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10177.html">Re: (ASCEND) K56 boards rev. F</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10190.html">Re: (ASCEND) K56 boards rev. F</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#10179"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd219.html#10179"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>