- -- Josh Bailey (<A HREF="mailto:joshb@xtra.co.nz">mailto:joshb@xtra.co.nz</A> - GroupWise <A HREF="mailto:j6bw@telecom.co.nz">mailto:j6bw@telecom.co.nz</A>) Internet Network Specialist Voice (DDI): +64-9-355-5923 Telecom Internet Services Voice (Mob): +64-25-514-899 Extension: 93423 (Lvl. 4, 120 Mayoral Dve) Fax: +64-9-355-5260 Private Bag 92028, Auckland, NZ Pager: +64-26-114-448 PGP public key available at <A HREF="http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html">http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html</A> DISCLAIMER: Viewer discretion is advised. - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 21:37:17 -0500 From: Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com> To: Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Re: Suggested LQM settings? Josh Bailey wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Wed, 29 Oct 1997, Kevin Smith wrote: > > > >Along the same lines, feedback on where to use it would be great too. > > >Is it appropriate for modem, ISDN, T1 links? Is it helpful/harmful for all > > >link types? Or only specific situations? What about client platform, in the > > >case of modem/ISDN TAs? Should/must it also be enabled on the remote device? > > > > This is Josh's pet subject, so I'll let him have a few words first ;) > > :) > > LQM isn't harmful and won't cause lung cancer. :) > > There are some situations where compatibility problems will arise: > > 1. If you're running Windows CE on the client, it won't be able to start > PPP. This is the case also for some UNIX PPP implementations. I swear I don't mean to be difficult, but I'm not one of the 4 people in the world using Windoze CE and I couldn't care less how well it works. > > 2. You should specify a minimum and maximum LQM range including 10 > seconds - this is required by Cisco's PPP implemention for instance. Yeah, but WHAT? 600 and 100? My question was- it don't seem to matter WHAT you set it to. So WHAT should you set it to? I know all about Cisco's brain-damaged 10-second thingie and could care less- like most of the list, we have MAINLY dialup>consumer>genericmodem issues here. > > 3. Win95's idle timer is defeated - it wrongly considers LQM's "traffic". > Duh. The Max idle timer will still work. All of my users have already defeated the Win timer. We recommend that, just to clear the air. SO. What do we set LQM to? or does NOBODY know? 'Shot > > - -- > Josh Bailey (<A HREF="mailto:joshb@xtra.co.nz">mailto:joshb@xtra.co.nz</A> - GroupWise <A HREF="mailto:j6bw@telecom.co.nz">mailto:j6bw@telecom.co.nz</A>) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQB1AwUBNFf3zPle+GEe9W4hAQHclgL/aodxMFv9ISc1+9g9wotVg5zoUghwWBiM eTTVAbLPfo3W/sdYOBkJWy8X/c3XBGIOcRCd14CVyQaomWzH8EpDoqq4936QcNcP AUm5ONI6A97euOaJVjd9jC3JJkz2mBCW =/yfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10227.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10225.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10240.html">Re: (ASCEND) 5.1Ap4 for the Pipelines</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10229.html">(ASCEND) Radius and CLID security problem</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#10226"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd222.html#10226"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>