RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?

To: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
From: "R. P. McCormick" <RPM@GCQ.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 18:31:34 -0400
Cc: "Ascend User Group" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <199808241930.MAA11781>
Reply-To: <RPM@GCQ.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On August 24, 1998 15:45 Kevin A. Smith wrote:

>> >>> > We took the plunge yesterday morning (5.0 to 6.1.7).  
>> >>> > So far, life is good: no users revolting (well, 
>> >>> > no more than usual ;-), no signs (yet) of memory
>> >>> > or IP Pool leaks <FX: looks for wood for touching>
>> >
>> >25+ days on 4048's without any problems!
>> 
>> With 6.1.7 ??
>> I though 6.1.7 was only released on 8/13/98.

Oops - sorry for the confusion.  We're running 6.1.3.

I was responding about the stability of the v.90 code, 
and if memory is correct, I think it is the same v.90
modem code used in both 6.1.3 and 6.1.7.

27+ days on 6.1.3 without any problems ...
now considering 6.1.7.

Bob McCormick

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) No LQM fix in TNT 2.1.9?
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread