(ASCEND) 2nd Interface on Pipeline running NAT

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: (ASCEND) 2nd Interface on Pipeline running NAT
From: "Roger Salisbury" <rogers@axs4u.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 12:14:52 -0600
Comments: Authenticated sender is <rogers@pop3.axs4u.net>
In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.19980109141221.007f5d70@cp-tel.net>
Organization: AXS4U Networking, Inc.
Priority: normal
References: <3.0.1.32.19980109095538.00a2ca70@pop.lynx.bc.ca>
Reply-to: rogers@axs4u.net
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

	
	Is it possible(does it work ;-) to run the 2nd interface
on the ethernet port to route normally while running NAT??

	
Roger Salisbury		Voice (830)303-3960
AXS4U Networking Inc.	Fax   (830)303-3864
rogers@axs4u.net	
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) Pipeline 15 with Max4004 (ammended)

From: Daniel <daniel@lynx.bc.ca>

(ASCEND) Telcos get new shot at ISP fees.

From: nolan@cp-tel.net (Nolan W. Bailey, Jr.)

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) SNMP: Getting Caller-ID with IP
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Good Idea from move Ap36 to Ap38??!?
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Telcos get new shot at ISP fees.
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 15 with Max4004 (ammended)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread