Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) Q: Status of OSPF in 5.0Ap36
At 04:10 PM 1/26/98 -0500, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
>
>On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Invalid Address Catcher wrote:
>
>> At 02:13 PM 1/23/98 -0800, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
>> >At 06:56 PM 12/9/97 -0500, Dave Van Allen wrote:
>> >>Oliver, unfortunately you must reboot to get OSPF running and to make
>> >>most changes. This is truly inconvenient and bad design, and no don't
>> >>look for a fix anytime soon.
>> >
>> >I'm looking at building the case for fixing this (assuming it is possible)
>> >and need to understand why it is "truly inconvenient"? How often do
>
> Building a case for it? Bwhahaha! It's common sense, Although it has
>gotten better, I still cringe every time I have to reboot Maxen's, From
>modem packs, Net-T1's disappearing etc.. The boxes are just happier
>without rebooting them.
"Building a case" is required when you're competing for engineering resources
against revenue generating new features. We use this to prioritize tasks.
Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: