Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) leaking pools in 6.1.0
On Sun, 5 Jul 1998, John Hodson wrote:
> Same here, whatever my InUse figures say, I always have 0 for Number of
> remaining allocated addresses: (What does this mean? Should it not be
> remaining unallocated?)
Searching the archive <URL:http://www.nexial.nl/> for "remaining allocated
addresses reveals (amongst 82 answers, headers snipped for readaility):
--------------------8<-------------------------
From: Dave_Howard@ascend.com
To: kevin@ascend.com
cc: Bcurnow@sonnet.com, Ascend-Users@bungi.com
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 08:50:19 -0700
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 4.6Ci22 IP pool leakage?
The "Number of remaining allocated addresses: x " means :
If the administrator makes a change to the IP pools, while clients are
connected using a number from the OLD pool, those addresses still in use
from the OLD pool are reported as 'remaining allocated' until the clients
disconnect and release the addresses.
Dave.
--------------------8<-------------------------
HTH,
Neale.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: