Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code still running

To: ascend-users@bungi.com (Ascend Mailing List)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code still running
From: Joe Pautler <pautler@grasshopper.cit.buffalo.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 21:43:17 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Craig Salmond wrote:
]
]	Ok.  I'm going to interject here :).. These are my 3 Maxen. They
]all report 0 free addresses, but don't exhibit any problems.

fyi... "Number of remaining allocated addresses:" does not mean
       "free addresses".  it has to do with if you change your ip pools,
       and there are still outstanding addresses.  see the archives for
       details.

___________________________________________________________________________
Joe Pautler, E.I.T.                             University at Buffalo
CIT/OSS Network Engineering                     224 Computing Center
http://www.oss.buffalo.edu/~pautler             (716) 645-3536

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MPP on a 4048
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Re: TFTP with NAT (WAS Pipeline 85)
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code still running
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Limiting ISDN in Radius to 64K
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread