Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) P75 Second Channel Comes Up/Drops TOO Fast - "Add Pers" Ignored
I had a similar problem with my P75 running 5.x and 6.x hooking up to my
ISP's Livingston PM3's running 3.1A. I experimented with various 5.x
and 6.x releases, as well as numerous parameter settings, searching for
a way to get dynamic bandwidth allocation working correctly.
The solution that worked was release 6.0.6, which presently has an
up-time of 48:00:01:45. I can email additional configuration info if
needed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin A. Smith [SMTP:kevin@ascend.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 1998 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) P75 Second Channel Comes Up/Drops TOO Fast
- "Add Pers" Ignored
At 12:47 PM 7/16/98 -0700, Rylan Luke wrote: I have a P75, Running
>Rev 6.1.0. I am connecting to an Ascend router, at least my new ISP
>says so. My problem is this: the second channel seems to come up as
>soon as the "Target Util" number is acheived; the "Add Pers"
>parameter is ignored. Also, as soon as the ALU drops below the
>"Target Util" number, the second channel is dropped; the "Sub Pers"
>number is ignored.
>
>This makes for a lot of unwanted connects and disconnects on the
>second channel.
>
>I have both "Add Pers" and "Sub Pers" set to 30 seconds, which
>should cause the unit to wait this long before adding and dropping
>a channel.
>
>This setup was working with my old ISP, but not with the new one.
>Same behavior occurs whether I use "MPP", or "MP" with BACP
>enabled. Any ideas?
Your ISP may have the add/drop parameters set on their side to
drop/add immediately. Both ends can make the request, and there is
no way to force your end to be in control in such a case....
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: