Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
From: Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@pointer.teuto.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 02:45:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <199807162232.PAA10540@owl.greatbasin.net>; from "Bruce Robertson" on 1998-07-16T15:32:15
References: <3.0.5.32.19980716120900.00ba3100@darla.ascend.com> <199807162232.PAA10540@owl.greatbasin.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On 1998-07-16T15:32:15,
   Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net> said:

>     Matt> You should be summarizing so that each OSPF router only sees
>     Matt> the supernet addresses.
> 
> No, you don't want to do that, unless you like having packets traverse
> your LAN more than once.

The supernets will also fail if you have a customer with a fixed IP or even
whole subnets roaming between different dialin sites. (Backup, travelling
etc)

Either you do dynamic routing, or you don't. I most likely will use the Max
in ripv2, which I have heard doesn't overload them. If even that fails, I
will use them with send-ripv2, and just have the Ciscos to do all the
routing.

Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée
	
--
Lars Marowsky-Brée
Systems Management

teuto.net Netzdienste GmbH - DPN Verbund-Partner
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max

From: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) P75 Second Channel Comes Up/Drops TOO Fast - "Add Pers" Ignored
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 7.0b0 available
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Making IGP work on a Max
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread