Re: (ASCEND) TNT warning

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

 I got confirmation from Ascend engineering that these warnings 
do not affect system performance, it's more or less that it was
unable to assign a buffer or timer, Something like that :)

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations / Network Access
Erols Internet (An RCN Company)


On Thu, 30 Jul 1998, Mike Jackson wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, 18 Jul 1998, William R Charnock wrote:
> 
> > I just upgraded some TNT's last night to 2.1.3.  The code has been running
> > well, but I just noticed a warning:
> > 
> >        WARNING:  Index: 140  Revision: 2.1.3  Slot 1/4 (tntmdm56k)
> >         Date: 07/18/1998.       Time: 00:47:59
> >         Location: 100238b8 10023b90 10023bb0 10091030 100236bc 100f0244
> > 
> 
> Yes, I get those..  They seem to be warnings only and don't seem to affect
> much of anything...
> 
> 					Mike Jackson
> 					TSCNet
> 
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) TNT warning
• From: Mike Jackson <mhjack@tscnet.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Backoff Q full
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.9
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) TNT warning
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) driver de placa de som/fax Rockwell
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread